ARMWARE RFC Archive <- RFC Index (5801..5900)

RFC 5803


Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                       A. Melnikov
Request for Comments: 5803                                 Isode Limited
Category: Informational                                        July 2010
ISSN: 2070-1721

 Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted
      Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets

Abstract

   This memo describes how the "authPassword" Lightweight Directory
   Access Protocol (LDAP) attribute can be used for storing secrets used
   by the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Message (SCRAM)
   mechanism in the Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)
   framework.

Status of This Memo

   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
   published for informational purposes.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
   approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
   Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5803.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Melnikov                      Informational                     [Page 1]



RFC 5803          LDAP Schema for Storing SCRAM Secrets        July 2010

Table of Contents

   1. Overview ........................................................2
   2. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................3
   3. Security Considerations .........................................3
   4. Acknowledgements ................................................4
   5. Normative References ............................................4

1.  Overview

   This document describes how the authPassword LDAP attribute
   [AUTHPASS] can be used for storing secrets used by [SCRAM] Simple
   Authentication and Security Layer [RFC4422] Mechanisms.

      The "scheme" part of the authPassword attribute is the SCRAM
      mechanism name (always without the "-PLUS" suffix), e.g., "SCRAM-
      SHA-1".  See [SCRAM] for the exact syntax of SCRAM mechanism
      names.

      The "authInfo" part of the authPassword attribute is the iteration
      count (iter-count in the ABNF below), followed by ":" and base64-
      encoded [BASE64] salt.

      The "authValue" part of the authPassword attribute is the base64-
      encoded [BASE64] StoredKey [SCRAM], followed by ":" and base64-
      encoded [BASE64] ServerKey [SCRAM].

   Syntax of the attribute can be expressed using ABNF [RFC5234].  Non-
   terminal references in the following ABNF are defined in either
   [AUTHPASS], [RFC4422], or [RFC5234].

       scram-mech     = "SCRAM-SHA-1" / scram-mech-ext
                      ; Complies with ABNF for <scheme>
                      ; defined in [AUTHPASS].

       scram-authInfo = iter-count ":" salt
                      ; Complies with ABNF for <authInfo>
                      ; defined in [AUTHPASS].

       scram-authValue = stored-key ":" server-key
                      ; Complies with ABNF for <authValue>
                      ; defined in [AUTHPASS].

       iter-count   = %x31-39 *DIGIT
                      ; SCRAM iteration count.
                      ; A positive number without leading zeros.

       salt         = <base64-encoded value>

Melnikov                      Informational                     [Page 2]



RFC 5803          LDAP Schema for Storing SCRAM Secrets        July 2010

       stored-key   = <base64-encoded value>
                      ; See definition in [SCRAM].

       server-key   = <base64-encoded value>
                      ; See definition in [SCRAM].

       scram-mech-ext = "SCRAM-" 1*9mech-char
                      ; Other SCRAM mechanisms registered
                      ; in the IANA registry for SASL
                      ; mechanism names.

       mech-char    = <Defined in RFC 4422>

   Note that the authPassword attribute is multivalued.  For example, it
   may contain multiple SCRAM hashes for different hashing algorithms.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3.  Security Considerations

   This document defines how the authPassword attribute can be used to
   store SCRAM secrets.  Therefore, security considerations relevant to
   [SCRAM] and hash functions used with it are also relevant to this
   document.

   General security considerations related to the authPassword attribute
   (as specified in [AUTHPASS]) also apply to the use of authPassword as
   specified in this document.  In particular, the values of
   authPassword SHOULD be protected as if they were cleartext passwords.
   A read operation on this attribute that is not protected by a privacy
   layer (such as IPsec or TLS) can expose this attribute to an attacker
   who a) would be able to use the intercepted value to impersonate the
   user to all servers providing SCRAM access using the same hash
   function, password, iteration count, and salt or b) would be able to
   perform an offline dictionary or brute-force attack in order to
   recover the user's password.

   Servers MUST validate the format of the authPassword attribute before
   using it for performing a SCRAM authentication exchange.  It is
   possible that an attacker compromised the LDAP server or got access
   to the entry containing the attribute in order to exploit a
   vulnerability in the subsystem performing the SCRAM authentication

Melnikov                      Informational                     [Page 3]



RFC 5803          LDAP Schema for Storing SCRAM Secrets        July 2010

   exchange.  Big iteration counts and invalid base64 encoding are two
   possible (but not the only) exploits in the format specified in the
   document.

4.  Acknowledgements

   The author gratefully acknowledges the feedback provided by Chris
   Newman, Kurt Zeilenga, Chris Lonvick, Peter Saint-Andre, Barry Leiba,
   and Chris Ridd.

5.  Normative References

   [AUTHPASS]  Zeilenga, K., "LDAP Authentication Password Schema",
               RFC 3112, May 2001.

   [BASE64]    Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
               Encodings", RFC 4648, October 2006.

   [RFC2119]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
               Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC4422]   Melnikov, A. and K. Zeilenga, "Simple Authentication and
               Security Layer (SASL)", RFC 4422, June 2006.

   [RFC5234]   Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
               Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.

   [SCRAM]     Menon-Sen, A., Newman, C., Melnikov, A., and N. Williams,
               "Salted Challenge Response Authentication Message (SCRAM)
               SASL Mechanisms", RFC 5802, July 2010.

Author's Address

   Alexey Melnikov
   Isode Limited
   5 Castle Business Village
   36 Station Road
   Hampton, Middlesex  TW12 2BX
   UK

   EMail: alexey.melnikov@isode.com
   URI:   http://www.melnikov.ca/

Melnikov                      Informational                     [Page 4]